|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Eastern Tuna and Billfish FisheryAnnual Status Report 2005-20086. Status of target stock6.1. Resource concernsThe five target species in the ETBF are highly migratory and internationally managed by WCPFC, therefore it is important to note that any assessment of resources is based on the WCPFC assessment (See Section 6.2: Stock assessments and recovery strategies). Table 5: BRS Fishery Status Report 2006 results for target species in the ETBF (Source: BRS,2007[5])
6.2.Stock assessments and recovery strategiesAlbacoreThe current stock assessment for albacore tuna in the south-Pacific (2005) identified albacore fishing mortality well below the mortality associated with Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and total biomass well above the level capable of supporting MSY. As a preliminary measure the WCPFC has implemented boat limits to prevent mobilisation of new fleets that would expand albacore catch levels but currently no need for a stock recovery strategy exists. A brief update of the stock assessment in 2006 reinforced the conclusion that there was no concern regarding the biological sustainability of the stock at the current level. Striped MarlinThe first formal stock assessment for striped marlin in the south-west Pacific was conducted in 2006 and results were surrounded by considerable uncertainty. Some model runs indicated that biomass and fishing effort were close to exceeding MSY. The WCPFC has implemented boat country limits in the south Pacific south of 15° south to prevent further increases in fishing mortality, which was the recommendation from its Scientific Committee. Broadbill SwordfishThe first formal stock assessment for broadbill swordfish in the south-west Pacific was conducted in 2006 and results were surrounded by considerable uncertainty. Some model runs indicated that biomass and fishing effort were close to exceeding MSY. Australia and New Zealand completed the stock assessment at a time that catch rate declines were occurring in the ETBF, indicating localised depletion of stock. No regional stock recovery strategy has been developed for swordfish due to disagreement between the parties but boat country limits have been implemented in the south-west Pacific south of 20° south. However, AFMA has implemented domestic arrangements (an annual total allowable catch (TAC) of 1,400 tonnes on swordfish since 2006), which is expected to stabilise catch rates and prevent further depletion of stock in the local area. Yellowfin TunaThe 2006 stock assessment of yellowfin tuna identified overfishing likely to be occurring in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) but the stock was not overfished. The WCPFC Scientific Committee recommended a 10% reduction in fishing mortality to maintain stock at levels capable of supporting MSY. The 2007 stock assessment however was more positive indicating that current exploitation rates were at the limit of MSY. No stock recovery strategy has been developed yet for yellowfin tuna by WCPFC. Bigeye TunaThe current stock assessment for bigeye tuna (2006) identified overfishing highly likely to be occurring in the WCPO but the stock was not yet overfished. The fishing mortality was above FMSY but biomass was above BMSY. The WCPFC has failed over three consecutive sessions to implement arrangements that would reduce fishing mortality. Australia assisted in tabling a Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) draft measure for bigeye and yellowfin tuna to address overfishing of stock which combined catch retention, FAD closure and longline reduction. However the measure was not adopted by the WCPFC due to disagreement between member states. The stock assessments for yellowfin and bigeye tuna indicated that most of the overfishing is occurring in equatorial waters whilst only moderate fishing mortality is occurring in more temperate waters (such as off Australia). Of particular concern is the capture of juvenile yellowfin and bigeye tuna when fishing on Fishery Aggregation Devices (FADs). AFMA does not allow the use of FADs in Australia. Due to the low catches in temperate waters, any stock recovery strategy to be effective, will need to address as a priority, fishing in equatorial waters where the highest levels of fishing pressure and exploitation of stock are occurring. Table 6: Summary of stock assessments completed by the WCPFC for relevant ETBF target species
(5) BRS (2007) “Regional Profile – East Marine Region: Description of commercial, recreational and charter fishing activities”. Bureau of Rural Sciences. 171pp. Page last updated 23 April, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||