- Fisheries A to Z index
- Antarctic Fisheries
- Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery
- Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands Fisheries
- Coral Sea Fishery
- Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery
- High Seas Permits
- Norfolk Island Fishery
- North West Slope Trawl Fishery
- Northern Prawn Fishery
- Skipjack Tuna Fisheries
- Small Pelagic Fishery
- Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery
- Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
- Southern Squid Jig Fishery
- South Tasman Rise
- Torres Strait Fisheries
- Western Deepwater Trawl Fishery
- Western Tuna and Billfish Fishery
- Environment and sustainability
- Harvest strategies
- Compliance activities
- Data collection
- E-Monitoring
- Data collection programs
- Data principles
- Data application
- Consultation
Data application
Who uses the data?
Fishery researchers engaged in stock assessments (through Resource Assessment Groups (RAGs), supported by fisheries management and Management Advisory Committees (MACs) are the main users of the data. Logbook data is the major component used for most stock assessments. Independent observers, independent data collection programs and catch disposal records provide information which is also used for input into stock assessments. The independent data can be used directly in the assessment or for data verification purposes.
Our Compliance Section use and manage several data collection programs. Catch disposal records are generally used by our Compliance Section for the monitoring and deduction of catch quota from operator’s quota holdings. Data collection programs such as vessel monitoring systems are primarily used by the Compliance section to monitor vessel activities to ensure compliance with regulations.
External agencies and organisations also use Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) data. Government agencies such as the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia (DAFF), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Bureau of Resource Science (BRS), State fishery agencies and international agencies are all regular users of AFMA data.
Certain collected data is also available to the general public and key stakeholders. Our Logbook Program and Data Management Section provide public catch information such as data summaries and fishing area maps. Summarised data is also available on a cost recovery basis.
Who pays for the data collection?
Industry carries the principal cost of data collection programs. Industry is generally aware of the need for accurate and timely information for management purposes. Emphasis is placed on generating high quality information at least cost.
AFMA recovers 100% of logbook costs and 80% of observer costs from fishing operators. The fishing industry is seen as the principal beneficiary of commercial catch data collected for input to stock assessments. Costs may be recovered from the overall fishery by means of levies or by direct billing of particular operators.
Catch disposal and vessel monitoring are managed by AFMA’s Compliance Section. Costs associated with these compliance programs, under the cost recovery policy applied by AFMA, are shared equally between industry and government.
Who can access the data?
The data collected by AFMA is held on behalf of the Australian community, but AFMA can’t release this data to just anybody. Instead it has to be done under one of AFMA’s functions or powers. AFMA has an Information Disclosure Policy that specifies what data is publicly available, and what is not. In essence, AFMA can publish annually aggregated catch and effort statistics for fisheries and fisheries sectors, but there needs to be a specific management reason to publish less aggregated data. AFMA may also be required to provide information to courts under a court order, or to Australian Customs, Australian Tax Office or other organisations who have access to AFMA data under their own legislation.
AFMA enters into agreements in the form of Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs) with research agencies such as CSIRO to conduct research and analysis on catch and effort data which contributes to the pursuit of AFMA’s legislative objectives. Under the terms of the MOUs, researchers and their agencies are bound by the same confidentiality provisions as AFMA staff.
Hot Topics
- Zone D gillnet closure to further protect Australian Sea Lions
- Continuation of Measures to Protect Dolphins in the Gillnet Sector of the SESSF
- Levies still due while disallowance motion considered
- Re-assessment of export approval for the Western Trawl Fisheries
- Comment invited on draft Torres Strait Finfish Fishery Strategic Assessment
- Submissions received on the draft Northern Prawn Fishery Management Plan 2012
Latest News
- Keep your VMS switched on
- Rebuilding plan for Southern Bluefin Tuna
- Seabird management plans
- Changes in the Gillnet, Hook and Trap Sector of the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery to Protect Dolphins
- Expect to be inspected
- AFMA and Anindilyakwa Sea Rangers
- Domestic Compliance and Enforcement Program
- Draft Shark Plan 2
- Changes in the Gillnet, Hook and Trap Sector of the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery
- Longlining TAC set for Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery
